Blog Rating

Selected Books by Edmund Blair Bolles

  • Galileo's Commandment: 2500 Years of Great Science Writing
  • The Ice Finders: How a Poet, a Professor, and a Politician Discovered the Ice Age
  • Einstein Defiant: Genius vs Genius in the Quantum Revolution

« Bee Social | Main | Mammals are Active Critters »

Comments

TLTB

This has little to do with your post, but reading your blog last week it occurred to me that many who resist or argue against the idea of innateness being a source for syntactic universals don't really know what syntacticians claim those universals are. Any debate takes on a bit of a futile flavor.

So I decided to post something at my own blog on the topic (even though my blog isn't about linguistics). I enumerate four principles that syntacticians would widely agree are universal and have some basis in innateness. I really think any argument against innateness has to provide non-innate stories for at least these four specific phenomena.

---------------------
BLOGGER: This is a great service. The post can be found at http://lameandblind.blogspot.com/

hugo

In case you are not aware of that, Dan Sperber and some of his collaborators defend a theory of language evolution that puts the stress on pragmatics, and that convincingly argues that theory of mind must have evolved before language.
See particularly these two papers
http://www.dan.sperber.com/evo-lang.htm
http://www.dan.sperber.com/metarep.htm
and my post on the topic
http://www.cognition.ens.fr/~alphapsy/blog/?2006/09/19/30-language-evolution-where-is-my-mind
By the way, Dan Sperber is also the creator, with Deirdre Wilson of relevance theory, the most important single theory in pragmatics, and the theory has obvious links with attentional phenomena, so you might also be interested.

Giorgio Marchetti

Hugo

Personally, I do not know Dan Sperber's work. Thank you for the indication.

Giorgio Marchetti

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Bookmark and Share

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Visitor Data

Blog powered by Typepad

--------------