Blog Rating

Selected Books by Edmund Blair Bolles

  • Galileo's Commandment: 2500 Years of Great Science Writing
  • The Ice Finders: How a Poet, a Professor, and a Politician Discovered the Ice Age
  • Einstein Defiant: Genius vs Genius in the Quantum Revolution

« How Did the Speech Triangle Evolve? | Main | Testing Two Scenarios »



Another critique of a biolinguistic approach in the link above in my name - this one in Spanish. There is a weighty inheritance of generative grammar on this new "gene-"rativism.


Sorry, I meant "the link below".


I also put my two cents in on the topic on my blog.
As Jose Angel said, the term biolinguistics is deeply intertwined with generative grammar - and thus maybe it should not be treated as a term for biologically oriented approaches to language, but as a denominator for the generatively oriented approaches in this vein.

It reminds me a bit of the term psychoanalysis, which also didn't refer to psychological enquiries into the humand mind in general, but only to eqnquiries in the tradition of Sigmund Freud.( I think Noam Chomsky still has a bit more scientific merit than Freud, but you see my point ;-) )

Maybe there should be another term for the other biological oriented-approaches to language.
BLOGGER: I think the term biolinguistics is too handy to abandon lightly, but the point about psychoanalysis has some merit. Psychotherapy covers a wider range of approaches. Maybe evolutionary linguistics.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Bookmark and Share

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

Visitor Data

Blog powered by Typepad